Systematic Literature Review of Sustainable Assessment Model in Vocational Higher Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12928/si.v23i2.459Keywords:
Assessment model, Higher education, Sustainable, VocationalAbstract
Indonesia prioritizes vocational education to achieve the Golden Indonesia 2045 vision by producing competent, work ready graduates. Despite strategic policies, vocational enrollment remains low relative to academic pathways, and sustainability focused assessment model for vocational higher education are scarce. Therefore, this study aims to map and critically analyze existing sustainability assessment model for vocational higher education using a PRISMA based Systematic Literature Review and bibliometric analysis with VOSviewer. A total of 8,035 records (2018–2024) were retrieved, and the 20 articles that met the inclusion criteria were analyzed for thematic coverage, methodological approach, and integration of sustainability dimensions. The results showed that although many assessment model integrate economic, social, and environmental dimensions partially, few comprehensively addressed work readiness, sustainability literacy, and socio environmental impacts in vocational contexts. Bibliometric mapping further shows a dominance of general higher education studies and an underrepresentation of vocational-specific investigation. This study proposed a contextualized conceptual framework consistent with the Triple Bottom Line (economic, social, environmental) and selected SDG targets characterized by vocational competencies and institutional assessment practices. The framework offers guidance for policymakers and vocational institutions to design assessment systems that improve graduate relevance and institutional sustainability. The study contributes a systematic scientific map and a foundation for empirical testing of the proposed model.
References
Baharum, S., Haron, S., Ismail, I., & Diah, J. M. (2019). Urban bus service quality through sustainable assessment model. In Int. J. Supply Chain Manag. academia.edu. https://www.academia.edu/download/78742969/1683.pdf
Committee, E. P. (2022). A view to the adoption of Regulation (EU) 2022. of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Regulation (EEC) No 95. of< Organization: European Union>.
Corvo, L., Pastore, L., Manti, A., & Iannaci, D. (2021). Mapping Social Impact Assessment Models: A Literature Overview for a Future Research Agenda. Sustainability, 13(9), 4750. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13094750
Gao, B. (2024). Exploration and efficiency assessment of the management model of higher vocational education with poa concepts. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.2478/amns-2024-1210
Haniza, H., Matondang, N., & Hidayati, J. (2021). Sustainability Model for Private Higher Education of North Sumatra Indonesia. AJARCDE | Asian Journal of Applied Research for Community Development and Empowerment, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.29165/ajarcde.v5i2.64
Keppo, I., Butnar, I., Bauer, N., Caspani, M., Edelenbosch, O., Emmerling, J., Fragkos, P., Guivarch, C., Harmsen, M., Lefèvre, J., Le Gallic, T., Leimbach, M., McDowall, W., Mercure, J.-F., Schaeffer, R., Trutnevyte, E., & Wagner, F. (2021). Exploring the possibility space: taking stock of the diverse capabilities and gaps in integrated assessment models. Environmental Research Letters, 16(5), 053006. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abe5d8
Kumar Mohapatra, S., Mishra, S., Tripathy, H. K., & Alkhayyat, A. (2022). A sustainable data-driven energy consumption assessment model for building infrastructures in resource constraint environment. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 53, 102697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2022.102697
Lestari, S., Bakhtiar, A., & Suliantoro, H. (2023). Green Marketing and Intention to Buy Green Product: Systematic Literature Review. Spektrum Industri, 21(1), 75–84. https://doi.org/10.12928/si.v21i1.103
Mathiyazhagan, K., Gnanavelbabu, A., & Lokesh Prabhuraj, B. (2019). A sustainable assessment model for material selection in construction industries perspective using hybrid MCDM approaches. Journal of Advances in Management Research, 16(2), 234–259. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAMR-09-2018-0085
Nguyen, H. D., & Macchion, L. (2023). A comprehensive risk assessment model based on a fuzzy synthetic evaluation approach for green building projects: the case of Vietnam. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 30(7), 2837–2861. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-09-2021-0824
OECD. (2020). Education at a Glance 2020. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/69096873-en
Pamucar, D., Deveci, M., Gokasar, I., Tavana, M., & Köppen, M. (2022). A metaverse assessment model for sustainable transportation using ordinal priority approach and Aczel-Alsina norms. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 182, 121778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121778
Pratiwi, W., Primadasa, R., Asri, V. I., & Waluyo, W. B. (2023). Barrier Factors Model of Innovation Process in the Furniture Industry Supply Chain (Case Study at PT. Duwa Atmimuda). Spektrum Industri, 21(1), 62–74. https://doi.org/10.12928/si.v21i1.55
Qian, Y., Dong, Z., Yan, Y., & Tang, L. (2022). Ecological risk assessment models for simulating impacts of land use and landscape pattern on ecosystem services. Science of The Total Environment, 833, 155218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155218
Rahman, K. A., Hasan, M. K., Namaziandost, E., & Ibna Seraj, P. M. (2021). Implementing a formative assessment model at the secondary schools: attitudes and challenges. Language Testing in Asia, 11(1), 18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-021-00136-3
Regulation, C. (2022). 1904 of 6 October 2022 amending Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation. In OJ LI.
Sacchi, R., Terlouw, T., Siala, K., Dirnaichner, A., Bauer, C., Cox, B., Mutel, C., Daioglou, V., & Luderer, G. (2022). PRospective EnvironMental Impact asSEment (premise): A streamlined approach to producing databases for prospective life cycle assessment using integrated assessment models. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 160, 112311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112311
Sajid, Z. (2021). A dynamic risk assessment model to assess the impact of the coronavirus (COVID-19) on the sustainability of the biomass supply chain: A case study of a U.S. biofuel industry. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 151, 111574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111574
Sarwar, M. (2023). Improved assessment model for health-care waste management based on dual 2-tuple linguistic rough number clouds. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 123, 106255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2023.106255
Statistik, B. P. (2020). Jumlah Penduduk Menurut Wilayah, Kelompok Umur, dan Jenis Kelamin, INDONESIA, Tahun 2020. In Diakses melalui: https://sensus. bps. go. id/topik/tabular.
Statistik, B. P. (2025). Gross Enrolment Ratio (GER) in Tertiary Education by Province. Badan Pusat Statistik.
Studiyanti, L., Aurachman, R., & Amran, T. G. (2020). Human Factors Analysis of Online Learning Process for Students on Selected Indonesian Campus (A Preliminary Study). Malaysian Journal of Public Health Medicine. http://mjphm.org/index.php/mjphm/article/view/695
Suleiman, S. Al, Cortez, A., & Monzon, A. (2023). Evaluation of urban bus service quality in a medium-sized City: Case study Oviedo. Transportation Research Procedia. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352146523003344
Susilawati, E., Lubis, H., Kesuma, S., & Pratama, I. (2022). Antecedents of Student Character in Higher Education: The role of the Automated Short Essay Scoring (ASES) digital technology-based assessment model. In Eurasian Journal of Educational Research. Doi: 10.14689/ejer.2022.98.013
Tabatabaee, S., Mahdiyar, A., Mohandes, S. R., & Ismail, S. (2022). Towards the Development of a Comprehensive Lifecycle Risk Assessment Model for Green Roof Implementation. Sustainable Cities and Society, 76, 103404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.103404
UNESCO. (2022). Global Education Monitoring Report 2022: Migration, Displacement and Education–Building Bridges, Not Walls. UNESCO Publishing Paris.
Veroniki, A. A., Hutton, B., Stevens, A., & Andrea, C. (2025). Update to the PRISMA guidelines for network meta-analyses and scoping reviews and development of guidelines for rapid reviews: a scoping review protocol. In JBI evidence Synthesis. journals.lww.com. https://journals.lww.com/jbisrir/fulltext/2025/03000/update_to_the_prisma_guidelines_for_network.7.aspx
Wei, X. (2024). Performance assessment of college students higher vocational mathematics education using fuzzy evaluation model. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 46(3), 7155–7171. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-235564
Wu, S., Duan, J., & Luo, M. (2024). Evaluating and analyzing student labor literacy in China’s higher vocational education: an assessment model approach. Frontiers in Education, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1361224
Zhang, F., Wu, Y., Zhang, L., Sun, X., Dang, Z., Gao, F., Yang, Y., & Ma, X. (2024). Optimizing Sponge Construction Scheme for abandoned mines: Sustainable Assessment Model Framework and practical implications. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 63, 105557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2024.105557
Zhang, S., Li, H., Wen, Y., Zhang, Y., Guo, T., & He, X. (2023). Exploration of a group assessment model to foster student teachers’ critical thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 47, 101239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101239
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Suryani, Dadan Umar Daihani, Tiena Gustina Amran, Winnie Septiani

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.





.png)



